Reasoning and suggestions of Hamza Arapahmetaki, resident of Irakliou. Against 1) Antoniou Hatzidaki, lawyer and 2 ) Georgiou Digenaki.
Dublin Core AlanıDeğerDil
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T13:28:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-13T13:28:31Z-
dc.date.issued1915-10-05
dc.identifierACIEVF00056
dc.identifier.other52860
dc.identifier.urihttps://archives.saltresearch.org/handle/123456789/65221-
dc.descriptionIn front of the court (Protodikion) of Irakliou the plaintiff states that a second sequestration can not be allowed and is not legal as the delivery of the document was to be given to him on 8 April but instead it was given to him on 10 April. The plaintiff also states that the expenses of the lawyer should be cover by them. The suit of Antoniou Hatzidaki, lawyer and against Hamza bey Arapahmetaki Andgeorgiou Digenaki the plaintiff asks for his payment 1036.70 drahmes. This was the debt the latter to Arapahmetaki.
dc.format21-31 cm
dc.formatHandwritten&Printed
dc.languageYunanca - Greek
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.titleReasoning and suggestions of Hamza Arapahmetaki, resident of Irakliou. Against 1) Antoniou Hatzidaki, lawyer and 2 ) Georgiou Digenaki.
dc.typeBelge - Document
dc.locationSALT Research
dc.catalogedbyELIF YILMAZ
dc.date.acquisition26.07.2005
dc.format.numberofscans3
dcterms.accrualMethodPurchase
KoleksiyonlarFinance
Dosyalar
Dosya Tanım BoyutBiçim 
ACIEVF00056.jpg676.32 KBJPEG
ACIEVF00056A001.jpg731.55 KBJPEG
ACIEVF00056A002.jpg691.04 KBJPEG